Pentagon ends transgender ban

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

The Pentagon said Thursday, June 30, 2016 it was ending the ban on transgender people being able to serve openly in the U.S. military. The announcement -- which removes one of the last barriers to military service by any individual -- was made by Defense Secretary Ash Carter, who had been studying the issue for almost a year.

By Jennifer Rizzo and Zachary Cohen

CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Pentagon said Thursday it was ending the ban on transgender people being able to serve openly in the U.S. military.

The announcement — which removes one of the last barriers to military service by any individual — was made by Defense Secretary Ash Carter, who had been studying the issue for almost a year.

The decision comes as the military has witnessed major changes in the role of women and the inclusion of gays, lesbians and bisexual service members in recent years.

Carter said the ending of the ban takes effect immediately and that no longer could a transgender person be discharged on that basis.

Transgender service members will also receive the same medical coverage and protocols as any other military member — receiving all medical care that their doctors deem necessary — according to Carter.

For current members of the military, this coverage will include hormone therapy and gender reassignment surgery if doctors determine that such procedures are medically necessary.

Incoming service members must be “stable” in gender identity for 18 months before joining the military.

“The Defense Department and the military need to avail ourselves of all talent possible in order to remain what we are now — the finest fighting force the world has ever known,” Carter said Thursday at the Pentagon.

“We don’t want barriers unrelated to a person’s qualification to serve preventing us from recruiting or retaining the soldier, sailor, airman or marine who can best accomplish the mission. We have to have access to 100% of America’s population,” he added.

“Although relatively few in number, we’re talking about talented and trained Americans who are serving their country with honor and distinction,” he said. “We want to take the opportunity to retain people whose talent we’ve invested in and who’ve proven themselves.”

Praising Thursday’s announcement, Aaron Belkin, founder and executive director of the PALM Center, an organization that has advocated for lifting the ban for the past three years, called this a “historic day.”

Now people “can serve without having to lie about who they are” and be “provided the medical care they need,” he added.

Carter said the decision was “a matter of principle.”

“Americans who want to serve and meet our standards should be afforded the opportunity to compete,” he said.

Capt. Sage Fox, a U.S. Army Reserve officer who transitioned in 2012, voiced her support for lifting the ban.

“This is about equality, about civil rights … about recognizing the decency of human beings, that we are all equal and that gender is not a barrier to service,” she told CNN.

Fox was not discharged after her transition but was shifted to the Individual Ready Reserve, meaning she could be called back to duty but would not show up for training, draw a paycheck or have access to health benefits.

This decision will have an impact beyond those transgender people currently serving in the military or those who want to serve, according to Fox.

“It’s going to go through and send a message to the rest of the world that the U.S. isn’t behind everyone,” she said, “that we do care about human rights, that we do care about equality, and we aren’t just going to talk about it, we are actually going to do it.”

The groundwork to lift the prohibition began last year when the secretary said he would study the “readiness implications of welcoming transgender persons to serve openly.”

“This has been an educational process for a lot of people in the department, including me,” Carter said, describing his meetings with transgender service members.

Fox, who has maintained an inactive status for the past several years, said she plans to go back into the service now that the ban is lifted and is already in negotiations about returning to the California National Guard.

“I’m excited for the opportunity to start leading troops again and setting an example for others the best I can on how to go through and be a trans woman in uniform and do it right,” she said.

Implementation of the policies associated with lifting the ban will begin immediately, but Carter noted that the process would occur in stages over the next year, a timetable that is comparable to the timetable it took to train the force following the lifting of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which banned openly gay, lesbian and bisexual people from serving in the military until it was lifted.

“Simply declaring a change in policy is not effective implementation,” Carter said. “That’s why we have worked hard on the implementation plan and must continue to do so.”

Still, several voices have been critical of the move, saying that it has come too quickly.

Rep. Mac Thornberry, Republican chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said last week he had a number of longstanding questions for the Pentagon that remained unanswered.

“In particular, there are readiness challenges that first must be addressed, such as the extent to which such individuals would be medically non-deployable,” Thornberry said in a statement. “Almost a year has passed with no answer to our questions from Secretary Carter. Our top priority must be warfighting effectiveness and individual readiness is an essential part of that.”

And in January then-Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson, appearing at a veterans and military town hall, said, “I do not appreciate using our military as a laboratory for social experimentation. You know, we have too many important things to do. When our men and women are out there fighting the enemy, the last thing that we need to be doing is saying, ‘What would it be like if we introduced several transgender people into this platoon?'”

But Fox said she does not expect a lot of hostility to Thursday’s announcement from within the ranks.

“We are not a bunch of 18-year-old kids coming out of high school. We are professionals,” she said. “We do a job, we wear the same uniform, we manage to go through and take millions of dollars of equipment and millions of dollars of training and go overseas in different locations and do something that no one else can do.”

At the upper end of the estimates, there are as many as 11,000 transgender active duty service members and reservists who will be affected by the decision, according to a RAND Corporation study cited by the Pentagon.

Carter noted the Pentagon received input from transgender service members and experts and medical professionals outside the department. He also said at least 18 other countries allow transgender members to serve openly.

The move comes after the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy was ended in 2011. In 2015, the Family Medical Leave Act was extended to cover all legally married same-sex couples and the Defense Department amended its equal opportunity program “to protect service members against discrimination because of sexual orientation.”

The Pentagon’s decision coincides with broader acceptance of transgendered individuals in the U.S., but also criticism from social conservatives.

Rachel Chason contributed to this report.