Utah lawmaker defends 72-hour waiting period for abortions after study finds rule creates hardships

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SALT LAKE CITY -- Four years ago, Utah became the first state to mandate a 72-hour waiting period before getting an abortion. Now, the findings of a study conducted a year after the change was enacted have been released.

The study found the waiting period placed financial and emotional stress on women, but one man who crafted the law is questioning the study's validity.

“For women trying to access health care, every obstacle we put in her way is a burden,” said Karrie Galloway, CEO of Planned Parenthood Association of Utah.

That's just what Galloway said the 72-hour waiting period before getting an abortion is: a burden for women.

“To require a woman to jump through hoops because the sponsor of the bill felt like they didn’t make good decisions or haven’t thought about them is stressful for anyone,” Galloway said.

A new study on the Utah law echoes her concerns. Researchers at the University of California conducted the study, and they found the mandatory 72-hour waiting period causes unnecessary emotional and financial stress for women who go on to have an abortion

“To have to make a second trip, take time off of work, find child care, whatever they need to do, this is a burden for women accessing health care,” Galloway said.

Galloway says the results collected from the 308 women in the study were no surprise to her. She said 86 percent of the women in the study went on to have an abortion

“I would hope when politicians were making legislation they would go to medical providers, go to the lives they were going to effect,” Galloway said.

But lawmakers who crafted it say they did just that, and they question the validity of this new study.

“It’s always risky to rely on the conclusion of a study that was paid for, where they don’t want to disclose who their funders are,” said Utah House Representative Steve Eliason, R-District 45.

He says that's just one of the red flags coming from the think tank behind the study, a think tank he said is known for its pro-abortion studies. He argues the waiting periods are necessary for an irreversible medical procedure.

“It’s interesting you don’t see big banks doing studies on why the 72-hour period after signing a mortgage is burdensome and costly,” Eliason said.

Eight percent of the women in the study decided against having an abortion during that 72 hour waiting period. That’s about 24 people.

“In Utah, our rate has gone down 8 percent in the last two years, faster than the national average, so maybe there’s some financial ramifications they’re considering as it relates to their business,” Eliason said.

Since Utah passed the mandatory 72-hour waiting period, four more states have followed.

12 comments

  • bob

    I’m against elective abortions, but I can’t see any justification for a “waiting period” for something that is LEGAL.

    By show of hands: How many of you liberals support waiting periods for gun applications? I’m just curious.

    • Bob's liberal buddy

      Liberal here. As long as the background check comes back clear, there shouldn’t be a waiting period. If it doesn’t come back clear, the nature of the crime should be considered. A non-violent crime shouldn’t stop someone from going deer hunting or target shooting later on down the line.

    • ANOTHERBOB

      Convicted cold blooded killers try to delay their executions as long as possible. Shouldn’t innocent unborn babies have the same rights?

    • DonaldMSmith

      >>My best friend’s step-aunt makes $87 hourly on the computer using his Facebook Account. She has been out of work for nine months but last month her paycheck was $12968 just working on the computer for a few hours….”
      Continued….”
      >>>>>>>>>> Check This Special-Work-At-Home…
      —————————————————————————————————

    • DonaldMSmith

      >>My best friend’s step-aunt makes $87 hourly on the computer using his Facebook Account. She has been out of work for nine months but last month her paycheck was $12968 just working on the computer for a few hours….”~
      Continued….”~
      >>>>>>>>>> Check This Special-Work-At-Home…
      —————————————————————————————————

  • bob

    “Galloway says the results collected from the 308 women in the study were no surprise to her. She said 86 percent of the women in the study went on to have an abortion”

    And 14% changed their minds.

    • Mary

      Only 8% decided against it during the waiting period. Of the remaining 6%, 3% miscarried, 2% were still seeking an abortion, 1 was still deciding, and one woman was pushed beyond the gestational date the facility allowed. So no, not 14% changed their minds.

  • Apologist JD

    “I would hope when politicians were making legislation they would go to medical providers, go to the lives they were going to effect,” Galloway said.
    I wonder if she includes the life about to be snuffed out in this statement. Evil murderers. Notice how everyone in the story talks about elective murder as healthcare? Normally healthcare is about improving quality and/or length of life, not destroying it. Can’t really call abortions healthcare honestly.

    • bob

      Some of the women DID change their minds. Which means there are some lives that were affected that the liberals don’t want us to hear about.

      Let’s talk to the kids who weren’t killed, and see what their opinions are.

  • ANOTHERBOB

    I see nothing wrong in asking a woman to wait a few hours before going ahead and whacking their unborn children. Is it wrong to try and save an innocent life?

Comments are closed.