How to help: Northern California wildfire relief

Tribes ask President for massive new monument in San Juan County

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SAN JUAN COUNTY, Utah -- A coalition of Native American tribes gave President Barack Obama a proposal for a new kind of national monument that would take up more than a third of San Juan County.

The Bears Ears National Monument would extend from the San Juan River north almost to Moab. It's a 1.9 million acre proposal, 200 thousand acres larger than Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument.

"As Native Americans we have been overlooked," said Eric Descheenie, co-chair of the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition.

President Barack Obama is getting no shortage of advice on whether to use the federal Antiquities Act to declare a new national monument in Utah, the question is what or who will persuade him one way or the other, and the presence of a Native American Coalition adds a new dimension to a debate often seen as an endless tug-of-war between environmentalists and Western states-rights advocates.

The coalition includes representatives of the Uintah-Ouray Utes, the Ute Mountain Utes, the Navajo Nation, the Hopi Nation, and several Zuni Pueblos. They want the new monument to be governed by a commission of five tribe representatives and members appointed from the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and National Park Service.

Utah Senators Mike Lee and Orrin Hatch and Congressmen Rob Bishop and Jason Chaffetz issued a statement:

"The Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition is an important stakeholder in the Public Lands Initiative. The Coalition represents many Native American voices that have an interest in how lands in San Juan County are managed. While many Native Americans who live in Utah oppose the Coalition's proposal, we welcome the input and recommendations nonetheless. Our offices have now received over 65 detailed proposals from various stakeholder groups regarding land management in eastern Utah. We remain committed to reviewing each proposal and producing a final PLI bill that is balanced and broadly supported."

2 comments

  • bob

    The U.S. Constitution does not authorize the Federal government to own the physical land within any State. And therefore it’s forbidden under the 10th Amendment.

    That’s why specific exemptions had to be included for “military reservations” and a national capital.

    When a territory becomes a State the public land is ceded to the control of the State. That’s how it always worked east of the Mississippi.

    It’s pathetic how meekly we allow the Federal government to exceed its lawful authority. That should outrage ANY American, regardless of how they feel about “the environment” or “public lands.” If the Fed is not subject to the rule of law then it is a tyranny, by definition.

  • sd

    ………129 my co-worker’s sister-in-law makes $81 an hour on the laptop . She has been fired for 8 months but last month her pay was $13369 just working on the laptop for a few hours. why not try this out .Get More Detail Here

Comments are closed.