Sober driver arrested for DUI when deputy blows through stop sign, hits her

MILWAUKEE, Wis. – Officials said a 25-year-old woman was arrested for drunk driving after an officer ignored a stop sign and hit her.

WITI reported the woman was seriously injured in the accident and wasn’t able to take a breath test or field sobriety test.

So the officer arrested her for drunk driving anyway.

Tanya Weyker said those charges were held over her head for nearly a year after blood tests proved she was sober.

Milwaukee County Deputy Joseph Quiles was working the night shift at the airport in February 2013.

Officials said he pulled out into the street and t-boned a passing car, sending it spinning into a tree.

Weyker was behind the wheel.

Her neck was broken in four places.

As emergency crews were working on her injuries, officers started questioning her.

“One asked if I had anything to drink that night,” Weyker told WITI, “And I told them a few sips from a friend’s drink.”

In his official report, the deputy made a note that Weyker’s speech was slurred, she had a light odor of alcohol, and her eyes were red and glassy.

Tanya Weyker suffered a broken neck in the crash, but was arrested for drunk driving. Courtesy: Tanya Weyker, WITI

Tanya Weyker suffered a broken neck in the crash, but was arrested for drunk driving.
Courtesy: Tanya Weyker, WITI

Officers arrested Weyker and initially accused her of five charges, including drunk driving causing injury.

The deputies report stated he stopped at the sign and then pulled out into the street.

However, a surveillance camera showed his car rolling through the stop sign without stopping.

According to WITI, that didn’t stop the county from sending threatening letters saying it would take legal action if Weyker didn’t pay for the damages.

Months later, tests results showed Weyker was sober during the accident.

But the was not dropped and she still faced charges.

Prosecutors didn’t drop charges until the deputy gave statements contradicting his original story another five months later.

MORE: Get more details on this story and this case from WITI

51 comments

  • Carl Mayo

    another example of obama’s militarization of the police.
    “probable cause” is being phased out, replaced by, “i just didn’t like the way he talked to me”

  • Mosquito

    It was Bush who championed the Patriot Act. But the overwhelming majority of citizens cheered it at the time. However, Obama has vastly expanded it. He claimed to be against it, and campaigned on a promise to eliminate it, but he has not backed off one iota from ANY part of it.

    Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither, and will lose both.

  • brittany white

    no I don’t feel like we can trust the police any more and its because of stuff like this. maybe there is one or two good cops out there, but id rather take my chances and run for help in a crowded mall than try to flag down an officer. I have gotten to the point where I cant trust them to do the right thing.

  • SovereignMary

    As the saying goes, “One bad apple can spoil the whole bushel.” But, in this case it seems as if the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Department is full of rotten apples when they covered-up the fact that the video clearly proved that Deputy Quiles blew the stop sign and caused horrific physical damage to Ms. Weyker that could have killed the young woman.
    I truly hope that Tanya Weyker’s attorney does file a civil lawsuit against the county and full out succeeds in winning huge monetary damages for all that the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Department has put this young woman through.
    Not only that but, …. Deputy Quiles should be fired from the department for his egregious and costly lies.

    • Ricky Ross

      Heck, in the city of Milwaukee alone, 93 police officers – ranking from street cop to captain – have been disciplined for violating the laws and ordinances they were sworn to uphold, a Journal Sentinel investigation found.

      Their offenses range from sexual assault and domestic violence to drunken driving and shoplifting, according to internal affairs records. All still work for the Police Department, where they have the authority to make arrests, testify in court and patrol neighborhoods.

      Officers who run afoul of the law often aren’t fired or prosecuted, the newspaper found.

      Consider …

      At least six officers disciplined by the department for illegal behavior suffered no legal consequences whatsoever. One was Reginald Hampton, accused of sexually assaulting two women he met on duty. Another was Mark Kapusta, suspended after a woman said he pointed a gun at her head during a drunken road-rage incident. Neither officer was charged or ticketed.

      Twenty-three officers got breaks from prosecutors that allowed them to avoid being convicted of serious charges – or any charges at all – as long as they didn’t commit more crimes and followed prosecutors’ instructions. One was Patrick Fuhrman, originally charged with a felony for a beating that sent his wife to the hospital and, according to a witness, left blood in every room of their house. A conviction on that charge could have gotten him fired from the department, banned from carrying a gun for life and imprisoned for 3½ years. Instead, he ended up with two tickets for disorderly conduct.

      Nine of the 93 officers were convicted of crimes. Some even spent time behind bars. Yet when their criminal cases were concluded, they went back to their careers with the Milwaukee police. At least one, John P. Corbett, was a police Sergeant by day and an inmate by night. Convicted of driving drunk with a child in the car, Corbett did his job at the police station while on work release from jail. His 13-year-old daughter told authorities Corbett took the wheel after she got lost driving back from a tavern.

      The Police Department, district attorney’s office and Fire and Police Commission share responsibility for keeping officers in line.

      All three fall EXTREMELY short!

      http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/at-least-93-milwaukee-police-officers-have-been-disciplined-for-violating-law-132268408.html

  • Ricky Ross

    The primary difference between cops and everyone else is that cops ASKED for the power to dominate and boss others around. These aren’t saints or rocket scientists. They are just people, and not usually very bright people, or very kind people … as the statistics show.

    They weren’t chosen to wear the badge due to their great virtue and courage; they APPLIED for the position! They were just normal people, and then they ASKED to be put in a position of “power” and “authority,” which should, by default, make you trust them a lot LESS than the average guy on the street. Yeah, in THEORY there is some screening process to keep the real nastiest one’s from being given badges. But that theory is now about as valid as the flat earth theory, given how many fascists have been caught terrorizing, assaulting and MURDERING harmless people … and getting away with it.

    So next time you see someone with a badge and uniform, don’t think, “Gee, an agent of law and order!” Because that’s B.S. … Instead, think, “Gee, someone who ASKED to be allowed to DOMINATE and CONTROL others!” Because that’s the reality of the situation.”

  • chris

    Wrongful arrest/ false imprisonment, defamation, harassment, oh and great bodily injury caused by the deputies irresponsible actions. She should go after them for a couple million in damages.

  • Terri Bashaw

    not only should charges against the young lady be dropped but this officer should be fired and then charged with obstruction.
    forget about Obama, he’s incompetent. get over it.

  • Dik4

    This happened in FEB 2013…why is this news now? Not to mention that 6 months is hardly “nearly a year”.

  • Paul l

    This is why dash cams should be in all patrol cars and should be functioning before they hit the road. The camera does not lie. People lie.

  • Jeremy

    Whomever wrote this article should have had someone do a spelling and grammar check. Feel free to hire me if you would like.

  • Jean Dulaney

    We all know there is corruption in SOME police departments… because–last I heard–they are human beings and prone to sin just like everyone else out there. For the most part, I believe the majority are of “good report”. Even so-called “men of the cloth” do egregious things on occasion. Always beware of the foxes in sheep’s clothes.

  • Countrynewsman

    The officer clearly should lose his job and face criminal charges. One more thing, that’s terrible that the wasn’t dropped…whatever the is.

  • John Decker

    Its horrific that related stories about the accidental death of a teenager fall under the head of “You May Like”.

  • Dudemellow

    Throwing stones in glass houses… You’re (not your)… Second you’re (not your), ‘spreading OUR manure around’. You ‘do care for Obama’… Humm, not that bright at all.

  • Patrick Hogan

    Grammerical errors aside. In my opinion obama is to blame for nothing. No I don’t mean he’s blameless, I mean he got elected to a country under the pretense he was going to change all the corrupt screwed up things, and then basically did none of them. He allowed things to continue in the directions they have been heading for years. but yes blaming him for the problems that have been the status quo long before he was in office, as if he caused them is rather inaccurate.

  • Peter Marcus

    Really, how many MRAPs did police get under Reagan? Since those didn’t even exist at the time, how about Humvees? Libs will go to their graves with Obama’s ballbag in their mouths.

  • Ross

    @Peter Marcus Wow you know what MRAPs are! I guess you know how to work google! Do everyone a favor and google search why the police are getting them… but on second thought I’ll tell you so you can save yourself the embarrassment. As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan comes to a close there isn’t the same level of demand for these types of military vehicles. Thus some are being transferred to police departments because they offer more capabilities to the police for example in Burton,MI the police department needed a vehicle that could power through the deep snow of winter during emergencies (obviously this isn’t the only reason but you get the point I’m getting at hopefully). Thus they received humvees… I mean I agree with you though… the libs of the people that will be saved by those humvees with definately go down Obama’s throat… or not because they’ll still be alive… you know… because the humvees will get through the snow… ps… think before you talk… who am I kidding… I’ll be waiting for your rage reply =D

  • Peter Marcus

    It’s so painfully obvious that you googled what an MRAP is and then are getting sarcastic about it in an attempt to poker face. Then found a few articles that you just now knew about and are parroting some information.

    Bottom line is no police department needs an APC that is designed to withstand IEDs, yet Obama gives out these weapons of war like they’re tic tacs. Humvees can be ordered from any dealership, why you even brought those up is pointless.

  • Nate

    @Peter
    >Mistaking a MRAP for an APC (Two different things with different purposes)
    >Acting like you know everything
    >Blaming everything on the President, when it’s actually the county and representatives that need to even demand these vehicles the first place
    >Thinking Obama pays attention to every single one of the 15k police organizations in the US and hands them an MRAP with his name signed on it
    >Criticizing Ross for bringing up humvees when you, yourself, clearly brought it up first:
    “Since those didn’t even exist at the time, how about Humvees?” -Peter Marcus
    >Corrupt state law suits and retarded policemen are obviously not militarization of the police.
    Please go, or go back to, school.

  • Peter Marcus

    I could pick a number of things and they wouldn’t be even remotely relevant to the article now would they? Also a very basic Google search will yield you plenty of articles on weapons of war being put on our streets as Obama tries to push a gun control agenda to “get weapons of war off our streets.”

    Watching the Daily Show isn’t a substitute for actually being aware of what goes on in this country.

  • Dan

    My local department just got a couple military grad humvees and other military grade weapons because of the “surplus” the military has. The town I live in has a population under 50k. If that isn’t militarization of a police force I don’t know what is.

  • M Austin

    Did he hit her with a tank? Police militarization is a valid issue that needs to be addressed. Blaming every police misconduct event, which are many, on militarization makes you look like the idiot you are. Reform is needed in law enforcement, absolutely. Ignorance makes police reform a joke. You sir need to think before you post.

  • Peter Marcus

    Yes, use over the top sarcasm like Colbert and Stewart, because actual debating is too scary to the left. Use emotion, use humor, anything but the truth.

  • Joe

    @ Peter – We don’t fear actual debate; we just don’t have time to debate with folks like you, as many of us hold graduate degrees and our work is more time consuming and involved than flipping burgers. Also, TV in general is not a great way to “learn the truth”, but I wouldn’t expect you to understand that either.

  • replyto petermarcus

    Ok, let’s debate, state the reason you believe this is Obama’s fault and not simply a case of a police officer abusing his power. (Here’s a hint for you: it’s not empty satire, it’s an analogy about how ridiculous it is to blame Obama for everything, but I supposed you can comprehend nothing short of a straight-faced statement of the obvious, which would probably go over your head anyhow.)

  • Peter Marcus

    He took every privacy and civil liberty infringement that Bush was flamed for and DELIBERATELY EXPANDED UPON THEM.

  • Guesty

    Maybe if you nutbags actually did a little research you could see that Obama really has nothing to do with this. It’s a policy that started under Bush after 9/11. Police are given massive grants (to fight terrorism) that they either spend or lose so they go out and buy all of the readily available surplus from our bloated military.

    But don’t let facts stop your raving lunacy…. They never have before

  • Crankyanker

    Ummmmmmm…. Constitution much? The President (no matter WHO it is, or whether he’s red or blue) doesn’t write laws. Only Congress can do that. Does he need to go? Absolutely. But you’re trying to give him ‘god-like’ power that the office doesn’t have. That’s part of the problem with him.

Comments are closed.


Related Stories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,319 other followers