Obama: Climate agreement ‘best chance we have’ to save the planet

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
By John D. Sutter, Joshua Berlinger and Ralph Ellis


PARIS (CNN) — President Barack Obama praised a landmark climate change agreement approved Saturday in Paris, saying it could be “a turning point for the world.”

“The Paris agreement establishes the enduring framework the world needs to solve the climate crisis,” the President said, speaking from the White House. “It creates the mechanism, the architecture, for us to continually tackle this problem in an effective way.”

He praised American leadership but noted that all participating nations will have to cooperate.

“I believe this moment can be a turning point for the world,” Obama said, calling the agreement “the best chance we have to save the one planet that we’ve got.”

Though the plan was hailed as a milestone in the battle to keep Earth hospitable to human life, critics say it is short on specifics, such as how the plan will be enforced or how improvements will be measured.

The accord achieved one major goal. It limits average global warming to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial temperatures and strives for a limit of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) if possible.

Some major points not addressed

The agreement, put together at the 21st Conference of Parties, or COP21, doesn’t mandate exactly how much each country must reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.

Rather, it sets up a bottom-up system in which each country sets its own goal — which the agreement calls a “nationally determined contribution” — and then must explain how it plans to reach that objective.

Those pledges must be increased over time, and starting in 2018 each country will have to submit new plans every five years.

Many countries actually submitted their new plans before climate change conference, known as COP21, started last month — but those pledges aren’t enough to keep warming below the 2-degree target. But the participants’ hope is that over time, countries will aim for more ambitious goals and ratchet up their commitments.

Another sticking point has been coming up with a way to punish nations that don’t do their part, but observers say that was never really on the table.

Instead, the agreement calls for the creation of a committee of experts to “facilitate implementation” and “promote compliance” with the agreement, but it won’t have the power to punish violators.

‘This didn’t save the planet’

Another issue, according to observers, was whether there would be compensation is paid to countries that will see irreparable damage from climate change but have done almost nothing to cause it.

The agreement calls for developed countries to raise at least $100 billion annually in order to assist developing countries. Members of the scientific and environmental activist communities responded with varying degrees of optimism.

“This didn’t save the planet,” Bill McKibben, the co-founder of 350.org, said of the agreement. “But it may have saved the chance of saving the planet.”

Jennifer Morgan of the World Resources Institute anticipated a “historic agreement that marks a turning point in the climate crisis.”

What happens next?

Even though the text has been agreed upon, there’s still much more that needs to be done before the agreement goes into effect.

The agreement was adopted by “consensus” during the meeting of government ministers. That doesn’t necessarily mean all 196 parties approved it; French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, who served as the president of the conference, had the authority to decide if a consensus had been reached.

Individual countries now must individually ratify or approve the agreement in their respective countries.

And the agreement won’t enter into force until 55 countries have ratified it. Those nations must account for 55% of total global greenhouse gas emissions.

That means if the world’s biggest polluters don’t authorize the agreement, enacting it could prove challenging.

China and the United States, respectively, account for about 24% and 14% of total greenhouse gas emissions, according to the World Resources Institute.

A senior administration official told CNN that Congress doesn’t have to vote on the plan.

“This agreement does not require submission to the Senate because of the way it is structured,” he said. “The targets aren’t binding.”

The pieces that are binding are already part of existing agreements, the official said.

One leading Republican criticized the agreement, saying it will place emissions restrictions on American industry while requiring the United States to give money to undeveloped nations.

“Once again, this administration is all too eager for the international community to review its commitments before even revealing those commitments to the American people,” said Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

The United States has backed off full support of climate change measures in the past.

The Kyoto Protocol on reducing greenhouse gas emissions was adopted in 1997. The Clinton administration signed the agreement but, fearing defeat, never submitted it to the Senate for ratification.

In China, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress is in charge of approving treaties.

From Xie Zhenhua, China’s chief COP21 negotiator, said, “Although this deal is not entirely perfect and contains some content that needs to be improved, this doesn’t prevent us from taking a historic step ahead.”

The agreement calls for a signature ceremony in April 2016, and requests that the U.N. Secretary-General keep the agreement open for signing until April 2017.

Fabius released the draft worked out by negotiators Saturday morning. Later in the day, world leaders or their representatives approved it. A crowd erupted in applause once the agreement’s adoption was announced.

‘We need all hands on deck’

Leaders around the world praised passage of the agreement.

“A month ago tomorrow, Paris was the victim of the deadliest terror attack in Europe for more than a decade,” British Prime Minister David Cameron wrote in a Facebook post. “Today, it has played host to one of the most positive global steps in history.”

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hailed the draft.

“We must protect the planet that sustains us,” Ban said. “For that we need all hands on deck.”

In the streets of Paris, outside the conference, protesters demanded action. #ParisAgreement was trending on Twitter.

“Nous sommes la nature qui se défend!” read one tweet, with a photo of one person dressed as a polar bear and another dressed as a penguin. “We are nature that defends itself.”

Some demonstrators felt differently — they called the agreement insufficient and chanted “it’s a crime against humanity.”

“We have a 1.5-degree wall to climb, but the ladder isn’t tall enough,” Kumi Naidoo of Greenpeace said at a press conference. He did call the agreement a “new imperative” and positive step.

2 degrees Celsius threshold

Capping the increase in global average temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius was organizers’ key goal going into the COP21. That level of warming is measured as the average temperature increase since the Industrial Revolution.

Failure to set a cap could result in superdroughts, deadlier heat waves, mass extinctions of plants and animals, megafloods and rising seas that could wipe some island countries off the map.

Scientists and policy experts say hitting the 2 degrees Celsius threshold would require the world to move off fossil fuels between about 2050 and the end of the century.

To reach the more ambitious 1.5 degrees Celsius goal, some researchers say the world will need to reach zero net carbon emissions sometime between about 2030 and 2050.

CNN’s Don Melvin, Ralph Ellis and Greg Botelho contributed to this report.

™ & © 2015 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.


  • Dan Gray

    Guess he has a rude wake up call as he cant do anything without Congressional approval.

    Hmmm, lets see.

    Executive Amnesty revoked by US Supreme Court
    NLRB recess appointments revoked by US Supreme Court
    EPA water rule revoked by US Supreme Court
    EPA Coal burning rule revoked by US Supreme Court
    Public Lands Anti Fracking Rule revoked by US Supreme Court
    EPA Mercury Rule revoked by US Supreme Court

    All of these were revoked by the US Supreme Court because Obama overstepped his Constitutional Authority with his illegal use of executive orders, something that does not and never has existed in Article 2 (Powers of the Executive branch) of the US Constitution. And considering that Congress is NOT going to pass this farce and Obama knows he WILL be sued yet again if he does try an illegal executive order…exactly what is he going to do? AND considering that even IF this is passed by Congress, if it violates the US Constitution in any way, then it becomes null and void and unenforceable, Obama has nothing he can give except hot air and political BS.

    • Dan Gray

      Sorry Bob, there is NO requirement that Congress pass every treaty or any treaty for that matter, and obama cant do squat unless they do pass it. And to make matters worse as per Article 2 of the Constitution, if this or any other treaty even looks like it is going to violate the US Constitution…the treaty is null and void and unenforceable.

      Thats my friend is in the US Constitution, so no the Congress does NOT have to pass anything. And since the US Constitution is the highest law of the land, there is nothing that can be done if they refuse to pass it.

      So good luck with that yourself. Oh and before you say anything else, you are speaking to a person who has been studying the US Constitution for over 40 years, so I do know what I am talking about


    The same liberal democrats who ran Detroit into bankruptcy will new step up to the plate and help finance our war on the phony global warming gimmick.


    What Detroit needs if for someone to save them from the results of 50 years of Democrats in Power. Obama is doing his best to turn us into a 3rd world power.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.