Highland couple asks city to allow them to bury husband in back yard when he dies

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

HIGHLAND, Utah – Should you have the right to bury your loved one on property you own, like your back yard? That’s a dilemma facing the Highland City Council.

Steven and Susan Ledkins sent a letter to leaders October 9th. They write that Steven’s health isn’t good. He’s going to discontinue dialysis treatments, but, before he does, he asks if the city would grant approval for them to dedicate a certain piece of their property as a private family cemetery.

The couple purchased the home in 1991 and paid it off, so they don’t plan on selling it.

“We have a high respect for private property rights,” said Erin Wells, public information officer for Highland City.

Wells said they’ve never received such a request, but they’re willing to consider it.

“Our current municipal code dictates that burials that can take place in Highland City have to be in our Highland City Cemetery,” Wells said.

While the city code doesn’t allow for private cemeteries, Highland has one. Five members of the Poole family, Highland’s early settlers, are buried at a cemetery. The Highland Historical Society is talking to the city about opening the Pioneer Cemetery to the public.

“It is such a historical site, important to Highland,” said Charlie Greenland, President of the Highland Historical Society.

In the Ledkin’s case, this is not a typical private cemetery, but one they would use for a personal family burial. Some city leaders are OK with updating the code, but others worry that people could turn their private cemeteries into businesses.

Wells said: “Our city council had concerns with what happens to this 50 years from now: If we were to have a cemetery on private property, what about access rights? What about upkeep of a cemetery? What about future property owners?”

Wells points out that a family would need to record a cemetery plot with the county so it will be on county land records, so nothing falls through the cracks.

City leaders are working out the details and plan to make the Ledkin’s wish a reality.

The council is expected to make a decision on December 1.


  • Mimi

    I think people should be able to bury their loved ones on their own property. Probably not the best idea, but as long as there is someone from the city make sure the hole is dug deep enough and all paperwork is filled out, etc. then it should be allowed.

  • Evan Johnson

    No way. Dead bodies all over the neighborhood. Relatives demanding access to their loved ones from new owners. Most house turn over every 7 years. This is stupid. Then someone will demand the right to move the corpse.

    • bob

      Two words: “Disclosure” and “due diligence.” (Well, okay, three.)

      Denying people the use of their own property because of hypothetical “future owners” is pretty outrageous. Simply require that potential buyers be informed, and then they can make their own decisions or arrangements. This is done all the time for other reasons.

  • laytonian

    This is a great idea as long as it is platted out legally and designated as separate from the home’s lot. It can then be used as burial space for others who purchase the home.
    But why not cremate and bury the ashes?

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.