Judge won’t dismiss lawsuit challenging Utah’s ‘Ag-Gag’ law

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SALT LAKE CITY -- A federal judge is refusing to dismiss a lawsuit that challenges Utah's controversial "Ag-Gag" law.

At the end of a long hearing Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Robert Shelby rejected the state's request to dismiss the lawsuit. Animal rights groups had sued, saying the law that criminalizes photography or video recording inside agricultural operations targets them and stifles free speech.

The Animal Legal Defense Fund, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and others sued over Utah's Agricultural Interference Law, which makes it a misdemeanor crime to go into a farm or other agricultural operation, and take pictures or video without permission.

On Thursday, Judge Shelby sided with the state and dismissed a group of academics and journalists as plaintiffs (FOX 13 filed a friend-of-the-court brief alongside other news media organizations). But he allowed the ALDF, PETA and Amy Meyer to proceed as plaintiffs.

Meyer was the first person to be charged under Utah's "Ag-Gag" law. In 2013, she stood on a sidewalk and filmed what she described as a cow being pushed by a bulldozer at a slaughterhouse in Draper. The Utah Attorney General's Office conceded she was wrongly charged, because she filmed from a public place.

"I think my case demonstrates that these 'Ag-Gag' laws can be used to intimidate law-abiding people," she told FOX 13 outside court. "Really, the only thing to do in a free society is to reject these laws altogether."

PETA attorney Matthew Struger said the law chills free speech by seeking to block people from exposing abuses within agricultural operations, some of which have led to federal food recalls because of consumer safety concerns.

He also said it specifically targets animal rights activists.

"There were legislators on the floor calling animal protection organizations 'terrorists' and 'jackwagons.' This was aimed to silence the speech of animal rights and animal welfare organizations," Struger said.

The Utah State Legislature passed HB 187 in 2012, with lawmakers saying it was protecting the state's livestock industry. Utah is among seven states with such laws. Utah's lawsuit is the first to challenge prohibitions on recording and photography.

"The law was passed in response to a specific concern that the legislature identified and it was narrowly tailored, unlike the other laws that have been passed around the country," said assistant Utah Attorney General Daniel Widdison.

Judge Shelby will hold a hearing at a later date to decide whether or not Utah's law violates the U.S. Constitution.





  • Suzanne

    Ag Gag laws are a disgrace! What kind of society seeks to hide animal abuse and torture? There is a special place in hell for those who harm animals and for the people who seek to hide the abuse and protect the abusers. There is no need for an ag gag law, unless you have something to hide.

  • trevor

    I’d love to know how animals are treated here. I don’t understand why they made this law. It’s a ridiculous law. I have farmers in my family that think the same. What is there to hide?

  • Letty Grayson

    There is sometimes, perhaps often, something to hide. But ultimately these laws will be the downfall and collapse of factory farming. Too many young people “get it”.


    We stumbled over here different web page and thought I might check
    things out. I like what I see so i am just following you.

    Look forward to going over your web page for a second

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.