California lawmakers push ‘gun violence restraining order’ after mass killing

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

California State Assembly Reps. Nancy Skinner and Das Williams.

By Michael Martinez

(CNN) — The mass killing near Santa Barbara, California, has prompted a proposal to create a “gun violence restraining order” that would temporarily bar a mentally unstable person from buying and possessing firearms after family, partners or friends call police.

State Assemblyman Das Williams, a Democrat from Santa Barbara, said Wednesday that the legislation is designed to prevent mass killings similar to last weekend’s rampage that left seven people dead, including the suspected killer, in Isla Vista, the off-campus student community for the University of California at Santa Barbara and the local community college.

The proposed law would create a system where family members, friends and intimate partners could call police to intervene with troubled loved ones. Law enforcement would be able to investigate threats and ask a judge to issue an order prohibiting firearms purchases and possession, according to Williams and state Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), who both announced the legislation.

Williams acknowledged that gun rights advocates are certain to challenge the proposal, but he contended the legislation would balance rights because a mentally unstable person would be entitled to a court hearing to overturn the order.

“If I was in Congress, I would be much more daunted about getting this passed,” Williams told CNN. “I think here in California, people have determined that enough is enough. We’re sick and tired of people dying in mass killings.

“It is not intrusive if the judge still has discretion over the matter at the end of the day,” Williams said of the proposed law. “And we believe that in this case — I’m not omniscient, I can’t tell you for sure that the tragedy would have been avoided — but what’s unique about this case is that the mother and father knew there was going to be a problem, and at this point, in current law, there’s no way for them to do something about it.”

Williams was apparently referring to how a mental health agency had been concerned about Elliot Rodger, 22, the suspected killer in the weekend killings. The agency consulted one of Rodger’s relatives and then called police to check on his welfare in April. Police visited Rodger but took no further action. On Friday, Rodger apparently killed himself after allegedly stabbing to death three people in his apartment and fatally shooting two women outside a sorority and a man inside a deli in Isla Vista.

The legislators say there is no mechanism to limit firearm access in most cases involving an individual in crisis while that person is in mental health therapy, substance abuse treatment or anger management, the legislators say.

Currently in California, family members may call police to intervene, but “if no crime has been committed, or the individual does not meet the criteria for an involuntary civil commitment to mental health treatment, there is essentially nothing that can be done to prevent that individual from purchasing firearms or to temporarily remove firearms from their possession during the crisis,” the legislators said in a statement.

CNN legal analyst Mel Robbins, a former public defender, echoed that current state law doesn’t provide an intervention process for such scenarios.

“There’s no mechanism for the police or for the public or for a mental health professional to basically say, ‘we need to take a look at this individual,’ just like we might yank somebody’s driver’s license for acting recklessly,” Robbins said.

The legislation has a chance of being approved in California, Robbins said.

“California has some of the toughest gun control laws in the country,” Robbins said.

CNN’s Ashleigh Banfield contributed to this report.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2014 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

3 comments

  • Bob

    Yeah, that ought to do the trick. We all know that restraining orders are affective when a slobbering idiot decides he was to commit a mass murder. For victims being threatened by a mentally deranged kissless virgin a gun in your hand will always trump a cell phone call to 911.

    The only thing more deranged than Elliot Rodger are the liberal legislaters in California that want to make laws they can’t enforce while judges make them unload criminals from their overloaded prisons.

    • Cartman

      It could potentially help if a crazy person is prevented from buying a gun. Here’s how I’d do it:

      1. Background checks are based on public information. So make it a cell phone app. And make sure the government is not informed of NEGATIVE results. In other words, if you are “checked” and you PASS the government has no business knowing about it. The current system is de facto gun registration. That’s why gun owners hate it. No gun owners that I know would want to risk selling to a criminal or a lunatic. We’d gladly do background checks if the government were out of the equation. Only POSITIVE results……a restricted person attempting to buy a gun…..should be reported. I’d gladly use such a system, and would not mind being “checked” at all.

      2. Make the “restraining order” possible, but give it an automatic expiration date of, say, 30 days. Beyond that it expires unless a judge makes it permanent. And even the temporary order should require a judge’s signature, based on probable cause and evidence. Sort of like a search warrant.

  • Bob

    The United States is 3rd in Murders throughout the World. But if you take out Chicago, Detroit, Washington DC and New Orleans, the United States is 4th from the bottom for Murders. These 4 cities also have the toughest gun control laws in the United States, and ALL 4 are controlled by Democrats. It would be absurd to draw any conclusions from this data – right?

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.