Federal judge orders Utah to recognize same-sex marriages

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SALT LAKE CITY -- A federal judge has ordered the state of Utah to recognize more than 1,200 same-sex marriages that were performed during a 17-day window when such unions were allowed.

In a decision issued Monday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball ordered Governor Gary Herbert and Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes  to "immediately recognize the marriages by the same-sex couples entered pursuant to Utah marriage licenses issued and solemnized between Dec. 20, 2013 and Jan. 6, 2014, and afford these same-sex marriages all the protections, benefits and responsibilities given to all marriages under Utah law."

After U.S. District Court Judge Robert Shelby declared Utah's ban on same-sex marriage, Amendment 3, unconstitutional on Dec. 20, 2013, more than 1,200 same-sex couples wed in Utah until the U.S. Supreme Court halted it pending an appeal to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.

Here's a breakdown of the marriages under a public records analysis done by FOX 13:

Same-sex marriage estimates in Utah

In his ruling, Kimball said that even though the U.S. Supreme Court's stay "put Utah’s marriage bans back in place, to retroactively apply the bans to existing marriages, the State must demonstrate some state interest in divesting Plaintiffs of their already vested marriage rights."

"The State has failed to do so," Kimball wrote.

The lawsuit was originally filed by the ACLU against Utah on behalf of four legally married same-sex couples, who argued the state violated their due process rights by denying them the same benefits as their straight counterparts.

Utah argued that because the U.S. Supreme Court granted the stay, Amendment 3 was back on the books and it could not recognize the marriages county clerks performed.

"It's so exciting!" Elenor Heyborne, a plaintiff in the ACLU's lawsuit said of the ruling.

"It feels just validating to have, again, our relationship recognized in a way that is so meaningful and important to us," Heyborne's wife, Marina Gomberg, added in an interview with FOX 13.

Judge Kimball gave the state 21 days to file an emergency appeal to the 10th Circuit Court. The federal appeals court is already considering the state's appeal of U.S. District Court Judge Robert Shelby's ruling, which declared Amendment 3 unconstitutional and allowed for same-sex marriage in Utah.

In a statement to FOX 13, Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes did not indicate if he would appeal the decision:

"The Attorney General's Office has not made an immediate determination about whether it will appeal Judge Kimball's ruling. According to the Court, this decision directly relates to the same-sex marriages that took place within the 17-day window and not the ultimate legal questions in Kitchen vs. Herbert. We are currently assessing the legal impact of today's decision and will respond within the 21-day allotted time period."

Late Monday, attorneys were huddling in Governor Gary Herbert's office to discuss the impact of the ruling. The governor's office issued this statement:

"We are currently reviewing the decision issued today by U.S. District Court Judge Dale Kimball. The ruling was issued with a 21-day Stay to allow the state to determine how to proceed and we are evaluating the options and how this decision may relate to the status of other pending same-sex marriage cases."

Read the ruling here:

 

Bill Duncan, the director of the Center for Family and Society,  with the conservative think-tank Sutherland Institute, released a statement:

"Today's decision is disappointing because it rewards judicial overreaching.

There's nothing in the United States Constitution that allows courts to mandate same-sex marriage on the states but one judge was able to do just that by issuing a novel ruling and then forcing the state to put it into effect before the court of appeals could correct any legal errors in that decision. Our system is weaker when judicial gamesmanship is not kept in check. We trust the 10th Circuit will do that quickly."

Sen. Jim Dabakis, D-Salt Lake City, who married his husband, Stephen Justesen, the day Amendment 3 was overturned, issued a statement calling on the state not to appeal:

"As the only member of the Utah Senate whose spouse is refused state health care benefits, resulting from Governor Herbert's order putting all legal, same sex Utah marriages 'on hold', I applaud Judge Kimball's decision. And I urge the Governor to respect the rule of law and withdraw his 'hold' on the dozens of Utah state employees affected as well as the hundreds of other married Utah couple.

I request Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes to stop spending millions of Utah tax dollars on wasteful, message lawsuits designed to degrade and hurt LGBT families all across Utah. Whatever your moral, religious or philosophical ideas about gay people, Mr Attorney General, I ask you to join many of your national GOP colleagues and recognize the inevitability of fairness and equality for all our citizens. History is watching Mr Reyes."

RELATED: Amendment 3 court filings

14 comments

  • docbeddy

    Why is it that a democrat can accuse the GOP of not following the rule of law, when an entire special interest group refuses to follow the rule of law that was already established. They didn’t like the law and went to court. The GOP is doing the same thing representing the view of a majority of Utah residents and a leading democrat doesn’t think that republicans have the same right to judicial process. What hypocrites the democrats are.

  • Cartman

    Why don’t we just get the “M-word” out of government altogether? The only issue at stake is the financial contract aspect of “marriage”, and that should be available to any adult citizens. Let society decide who is, and isn’t, “married.”

  • Jack Nicasmen

    Let’s just be clear. The people of Utah didn’t pass homosexual marriage. One Federal Judge did. The people of California didn’t pass homosexual marriage, One federal judge did. And so on. Homosexuals and their supporters strut around arrogantly like roosters crowing “equality” — yet have ZERO for anyone else. The Homosexual Cult demands you call homogamy “marriage,” like The Taliban demands you call Mohammed “God’s prophet.” They’re totalitarian, anti-American, anti-intellectual and they’re as power hungry and bigoted as any fanatical group in America. You also can’t tell us that every single one of those cases were heard before a partisan, biased, liberal who was homosexual friendly..

    • Trish Ramirez

      No, the ‘people of Utah’ (largely funded by the smear campaign of the LDS cult) passed an Unconstitutional amendment that infringed upon the human and Constitutional rights of a segment of the Utah population. Because this law was discriminatory and hateful, it was overturned, thus allowing ALL Utahns the same rights regarding marriage and all of the inherent benefits thereof. In the same way the citizens of a state cannot vote away the rights of a group based upon their skin color, they cannot vote away the rights of a group based upon their sexuality. A group of American citizens has no Constitutional right to strip away the rights of other American citizens simply because they disagree with their lifestyle. Marriage, in our society, is more than just a word to describe a civil or religious union. Being married allows for certain legal protections and a certain level of secular and social recognition of a committed relationship that is unequaled historically and currently.

      Saying that the LGBT community should be happy with ‘civil unions’ as opposed to real marriage is like saying that the African American community should have been content with ‘separate but equal.’ It’s ridiculous. The reason that bigots are so OPPOSED to the LGBT community being able to marry is because they KNOW there is something socially significant about being able to legally use terms like ‘married’ and ‘spouse’ and ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ and they would like to believe that only THEIR version of marriage is valid, that their relationships are somehow better, more special or more significant than any relationship entered into by a same-gender couple. They want to belittle and degrade the committed relationships of the LGBT community into something lessor and insignificant so that they can feel morally and socially superior.

      It is ignorance and hatred and grandstanding at it’s most childish to oppose the right of LGBT citizens to enjoy the same social protections and recognition as you yourself take for granted in our culture.

    • Eric Cartman

      How does it feel to filled with so much hate? Must be a sad existence… Meanwhile the rest of humanity will evolve and accept everyone for who they are…

  • Dude

    Sweet Trish, then we can count on your support for those wanting to marry their animals and those wanting plural marriage.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.