FCC moves forward with fast-lane plan

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

By James O’Toole

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — We’re one step closer to fast lanes on the Internet.

The Federal Communications Commission voted Thursday to move forward with a proposal that would allow broadband providers to charge companies like Amazon and Netflix for prioritized access to consumers.

There’s still a lot left to be resolved — the proposal is now open for public comment for the next four months, and could be changed before a final vote to implement it.

FCC chairman Tom Wheeler has been at the center of controversy over the fast lane proposal. In remarks ahead of the commission’s vote, he sought to reassure Internet freedom activists, saying he remains committed to an “open Internet.”

“If someone acts to divide the Internet between haves and have-nots, we will use every power to stop it,” he said.

Under his plan, Wheeler said, broadband companies won’t be allowed to block legal content outright or slow traffic below a certain acceptable threshold of service. The FCC would retain the power to review the business arrangements of Internet service providers, invalidating them if they’re determined “commercially unreasonable.”

Wheeler added that the FCC is still open to reclassifying broadband service as a utility, which would subject it to stricter regulation, though that’s not the focus of his proposal.

“We look forward to feedback on all approaches,” he said.

But Wheeler’s assurances may not provide much comfort for net neutrality supporters, who worry that any system in which companies can pay for faster access to consumers will disadvantage smaller websites and applications against larger, deep-pocketed rivals. They also worry that if content providers are forced to pay broadband companies more for high-speed delivery, those costs will be passed onto consumers.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2014 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

5 comments

  • Cartman

    Makes sense to me. Somebody is paying for that bandwidth, one way or another. It should be the people who are actually using it.

  • Ivan

    This is a very bad idea. They need to classify internet providers as a utility. Would you stand for the UPS guy holding on to your packages from amazon because he had to deliver a lot of them that day? This proposal just gives them the right to extort more money from companies that rely on internet providers and artificially slow down internet access.

  • Michael Long

    Boo!!! Bad Idea!! Everyone needs to realize that internet access is a right that every American citizen should have. If we allow this, then it will be no different than was is happening in China. I’m extremely disappointed with the law makers in this country. The rich and power keep getting richer and more powerful, meanwhile the middle class and the lower class citizens have to pay the cost.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.