Will Utah recognize same-sex marriages performed before SCOTUS stay?

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SALT LAKE CITY -- The Utah Attorney General's Office is preparing a legal opinion on whether the state should recognize same-sex marriages performed in the state before the Supreme Court halted them.

The opinion, which is expected to be presented to Governor Gary Herbert on Wednesday, will determine if the state provides services to legally wed same-sex couples pending the appeal.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to stay same-sex marriages in Utah pending an appeal of Amendment 3 has placed hundreds of couples in a legal gray area. After the Dec. 20 decision declaring it unconstitutional, Governor Gary Herbert directed state agencies to offer services in compliance with a federal judge's order.

But now that the Supreme Court justices have stayed the request, many agencies are wondering if they still must comply.

"Many couples are calling me wondering if they're still married and wondering what the legal implications are for their tax returns," said Clifford Rosky, a University of Utah law professor and chairman of the board of the gay rights group Equality Utah. "Some of them have already begun adoption proceedings and they don't know whether to go forward. It's a complicated and stressful situation for more than 1,000 families."

Since Utah's constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman was overturned, a FOX 13 survey of county clerks statewide found approximately 1,360 same-sex couples have wed.

In court filings, the state has sought to invalidate the marriages should it prevail on appeal. On Tuesday, some state agencies sought advice from the governor's office on whether to offer services despite the stay.

The Utah State Tax Commission is meeting Thursday to decide if legally wed same-sex couples can file joint tax returns in the state. The IRS is allowing it on a federal level, but Utah's Amendment 3 defines marriage as between a man and a woman and does not recognize anything else.

State tax commission spokesman Charlie Roberts said the agency was urging people to wait.

"You're unable to file your federal taxes until January 31 anyway, so we just ask that, even though it's an inconvenience, you hang tight," he said.

Some attorneys have said that if Utah attempts to declare the marriages invalid, it could trigger a new round of litigation against the state.

Meanwhile, Utah was moving ahead with its appeal of Judge Robert Shelby's decision declaring Amendment 3 unconstitutional. The attorney general's office had a deadline Tuesday night for law firms to bid to represent Utah in the appeals process.  That deadline was extended to January 14 "to increase competition," spokeswoman Missy Larsen told FOX 13.

She would not say how many firms had applied, but said a committee would meet to select the outside counsel.

The state has suggested it would spend as much as $2 million to defend Amendment 3 before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, and, possibly, the U.S. Supreme Court.


  • Jason

    Eventually Utah is going to have to whether they like it or not. I don’t see Utah having any chance of winning the appeal. US Constitution trumps state law and now that DOMA is dead, Utah doesn’t have much of a case. Not very much longer after that, marriage equality will spread nationwide. The days of discrimination based upon which God you chose to worship are just about over.

  • mark lawrence

    The State has said it will spend as much as 2 million dollars to “defend Amendment 3”, The plaintiffs attorneys are working from donations and the costs and fees are not included in the litigation. The plaintiffs legal fees are not going to be shoved off onto Utah taxpayers. Restore Our Humanity is funding the suit and depends on donations.

  • Jason

    This is a case of national proportions… Where’s MSNBC, JCPenney, Starbucks, Elton John and others at on this? I’ll go to the website and give what I can… But I would think some of big cooperate fans would be pitching in. I mean, after all, we have a lot of spending power (and love to shop! lol) and been highly profitable for them.

  • Joe

    The state is inviting yet another lawsuit if they don’t recognize these marriages. The law was struck down and the state had not asked for any stay for the decision, and therefore couples were married. And a marriage cannot be annulled unless a court ordered it. And thus, if the state refuses to recognize them, it invites yet more litigation to make them do so.

    Will that come out of the $2 million they already set aside to “defend” this amendment?

  • Christopher Beebe

    Well, once a couple is married, it’s binding and legal, whether a State acknowledges it or not. But if a State doesn’t acknowledge it as legal because it doesn’t fit the State’s definition of marriage, it’s doing so out of contempt of the U.S. Constitution. On the other hand, if a Federal court or the Supreme Court halts such marriages … that puts all those once-legal and once-binding marriages in a gray area.

  • John R Costello

    Utah – even WHEN Equality does COME BACK to UTAH which it will……I still may avoid such a hateful, bigoted state…..never been there, I dont spend my money in Hate states…..so basically I avoid the south and Most of the USA

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.