23 million fewer Americans insured under House GOP bill, says CBO

The House Republican health care bill would leave 23 million fewer Americans with health insurance by 2026 than under Obamacare, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

The House Republican health care bill would leave 23 million fewer Americans with health insurance by 2026 than under Obamacare, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.

The highly anticipated CBO score is likely to trigger another round of negative headlines and more hurdles for Republicans as they look to advance a controversial piece of legislation that was passed in the House earlier this month.

The CBO also found the bill would reduce deficits by $119 billion compared with Obamacare.

Eager to notch a political win in the GOP’s years-long mission to repeal Obamacare, Republican lawmakers took a gamble by voting before the CBO could analyze last-minute changes to the bill.

The new CBO report will serve as an important report card for Senate Republicans as they deliberate over their own version of the health care bill.

The report also shed some light into how the House GOP bill, titled the American Health Care Act, would change the nation’s individual health insurance market.

The legislation would end enhanced funding for Medicaid expansion, while overhauling the entire Medicaid program. It would eliminate the mandates that require nearly all Americans to have coverage and companies with more than 50 workers provide health benefits. And it would jettison Obamacare’s taxes on the wealthy, insurers and others, while allowing insurers to charge more to older policyholders.

The agency has already issued two reports on earlier versions of the GOP health care bill, but lawmakers continued to make changes up until the last minute to secure enough votes for passage.

The legislation that ultimately passed would allow states to waive two key Obamacare protections for those with pre-existing conditions. Insurers in these states would be allowed to charge higher premiums to those with pre-existing conditions if they let their coverage lapse. Carriers would also be allowed to offer skimpier plans that would have lower premiums, but not cover as many benefits.

These last-minute amendments would divide the market into three, with each having very different outcomes in terms of coverage and premiums, the CBO found.

About one-sixth of the population live in states that would opt to make major changes to their insurance regulation, lowering premiums for the young and healthy, but likely leaving many of the sick unable to afford coverage because their rates would continue to escalate.

One-third of Americans live in states that would make “moderate changes” to regulations. Their average premiums would be lower by 2026 than they would be under Obamacare, but mainly because they would have fewer benefits. Younger people would see “substantially larger” reductions in premiums, while older enrollees would have “substantially smaller” ones.

The remaining half of the country would live in areas that would retain Obamacare’s protections. They would see minimal decreases in premiums, though the amount would vary widely by age.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch sent Fox 13 News this statement:

“Today’s CBO score lays down an important marker for the Senate as we work to chart a course forward for the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. Now, we will carefully scrutinize this latest data and work to ensure the House legislation fits into the constraints of the reconciliation process in the Senate, all while continuing to strive toward our policy goals to implement patient-centered health reforms that address costs and promote choice and competition.”

Here are the top takeaways on what the CBO found.

1. 23 million fewer will be insured

The recent revisions to the House GOP bill would slightly lessen the harsh impact of the Republican plan to repeal Obamacare. CBO’s assessment of the original legislation found that 24 million fewer people would have coverage by 2026.

Under the latest bill, some 51 million non-elderly Americans would be uninsured by 2026, compared to 28 million projected under Obamacare. This would reverse major gains in coverage among the uninsured since Obamacare’s exchanges opened and Medicaid expansion went into effect in 2014.

The legislation would still hit poor Americans the hardest. Some 14 million fewer people would qualify for Medicaid in 2026, the same number as in CBO’s original assessment.

The projected decline in coverage is one of the main objections critics have to the GOP proposal. CBO’s score of the initial bill unleashed a flood of criticism from Democrats, Obamacare supporters and lawmakers’ constituents.

Lawmakers have had to contend with supporting a bill that would strip away coverage from so many Americans. They’ve been particularly divided over making drastic cuts to Medicaid.

Complicating matters further: President Trump’s past promises on coverage. He vowed early this year that the Republican bill will provide “insurance for everybody.”

2. Average premiums would be lower … for the young and healthy

The impact on premiums would depend greatly on where one lives.

In the states that don’t request waivers, average premiums would be about 4% lower than under Obamacare.

In areas that opt to make modest changes, premiums would be reduced by 20%, on average, but mainly because insurers would cover fewer benefits.

And in the places that opt to jettison the Obamacare protections, premiums would vary widely based on a consumer’s health status and the benefits provided in the policy.

3. The bill would save less than previous bill

The legislation would reduce federal deficits by $119 billion over 10 years, the CBO found.

An earlier version of the bill would have lowered the deficits by $150 billion, but lawmakers then added more money to a stability fund for states to deal with costly enrollees.

The savings figure should allow a small sigh of relief for Republicans. Under budget reconciliation — a process that allows the Senate to pass a bill with only 51 simple majority “yes” votes — the GOP bill must hit a $2 billion savings goal over the next decade.

If that threshold had not been met, the House would have had to vote again on a new bill.